California Florida Gulf of Mexico North Carolina
Welcome to KeepAmericaFishing.org  

 

 

 

This Web site is dedicated to conserving healthy fish populations through sound fishery management; to good stewardship of our resources through sound angling practices; to maintaining access to fish; and to the 45 million licensed U.S. anglers who support fishery conservation with their license fees and taxes paid on sportfishing equipment.

For today's anglers and boaters, getting out on the water is a refreshing escape from the hustle and bustle of everyday life. Individually, spending the day fishing with family or friends, or just enjoying some time alone, may not seem like much, but just by doing what they love to do, anglers and boaters contribute $20 billion per year to this nation's economy.

 

 

 
Fishing Access Information
The Sportfishing Community's Position
Fishing Facts
 

 

Access to marine fishing is in danger

There is a new threat to sportfishing in the United States—the banning of recreational fishing in coastal waters as a means to manage fish populations.

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) were originally intended to restrict the serious impacts of commercial fishing on a few species. But, MPAs have been expanded to now include low impact recreational fishing on all species. The establishment of MPAs is leading increasingly to the creation of no-fishing zones, which result in significant permanent closures for recreational saltwater fishing.

This is possibly one of the most significant threats to the future of sportfishing. Banning sportfishing is an unprecedented step and runs counter to the proven methods of fisheries conservation management that have served recreational anglers well for decades.

The MPA precedent for widespread North American recreational fishing closures has its origins in California coastal waters under state jurisdiction, extending to the three mile limit. The Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary was designated in 2003 and resulted in 175 square miles of closures to sportfishing. No fishing zones in the Channel Islands could cost California's economy over $100 million in direct expenditures and up to 2,700 jobs. Additionally, the state’s Marine Life Protection Act has already closed 85 square miles of California central coast waters to anglers, and implementation is just beginning. Although California is at the forefront of using closures as the “new fishery science,” other coastal areas are also being pressed to consider the same measures.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Marine Protected Areas Center has also weighed in, recently publishing a ‘Draft Framework for Developing the National System of Marine Protected Areas’ (Draft). The most glaring omission in the Draft is the issue of access to and use of marine resources within an MPA. The Draft currently does not require that national MPAs be designated through a balanced process that takes the interests of the sportfishing community into consideration. There is also an attempt to overrule the Magnuson Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, under which substantial gains for sustainable fisheries have been achieved. Through this Act, many fish stocks are on the road to recovery.

 

The Sportfishing Community’s Position

There is a fundamental difference between a family enjoying a day's fishing and a commercial fishing crew fishing for profit. This point is often overlooked by those who advocate for no-fishing zones. Conservation organizations, angler groups, the sportfishing industry and others strongly support both conserving our fish and waters while protecting the public's right to access all areas along our nation's coastlines and to enjoy the sport of fishing. These two concepts are compatible.

Many current proposals to restrict recreational fishing are not based on sound scientific evidence. Every angler on the water today is governed by a strict set of regulations that have been proven to conserve fish and their habitats.

Occasionally these regulations do include well-defined, scientifically-based closed areas which are supported by anglers. However, the angling community is not likely to support no-fishing zones when other less drastic, yet equally effective options are available. These bans on fishing not only adversely affect the recreation of 13 million saltwater anglers and their families, but also have significant economic impacts on businesses and communities that depend on recreation and tourism.

The sportfishing community is developing a program to achieve greater balance in the process of closure designation, including better consideration of the science, and a more balanced and thoughtful approach so that sportfishing prohibitions are limited to areas in which they are clearly beneficial to the health of the fishery.

Fishing Facts

  • 93 percent of Americans support legal recreational fishing.
  • Signed in 1995, Presidential Executive Order 12962 directs federal agencies to promote and protect sportfishing opportunities.
  • There are 13 million saltwater anglers in the united States.
  • Florida, California and Texas are the most popular saltwater fishing states.
  • Saltwater anglers spend over $20 BILLION annually on their sport.
  • Commercial fishing operations are responsible for 97 percent of all marine fish landed; recreational anglers land only 3 percent.
  • According to the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), only 8 percent of marine fish stocks are actively being overfished. Most other species are on the road to recovery.
  • Many environmental groups are pushing to restrict public access in anywhere from 5-20 percent of all ocean areas.